Loading...
Loading...
Three steps to catch review comments earlier — before you submit.
Upload architectural PDFs. BuildCompass ingests the set, identifies relevant sheets, and pulls the labeled information reviewers look for.
We evaluate rules using what's explicitly documented in the drawings. Results are grouped as Likely Compliant, Issues to Review, or Needs Clarification when details aren't shown.
Share results internally, address gaps, and re-run checks in minutes—so you submit with fewer surprises and fewer resubmittals.
Standard AI often hallucinates small measurements because it views entire pages as a single low-resolution image. BuildCompass takes a fundamentally different approach.
Every large-scale blueprint is precision-dissected into 9 high-resolution overlapping tiles for granular analysis.
Analyzing drawings at 9× the standard resolution ensures every 1/8" dimension and fractional note is captured with enhanced accuracy.
While standard AI treats a 24×36 sheet like a thumbnail, we analyze it like a forensic engineer—with precision-engineered rigor.
Real-time forensic scanning visualization
Standard on all Professional plans to ensure Building Code compliance at scale.
Practical outcomes for architecture teams preparing permit submissions.
Surface likely issues and missing information before plans are submitted — not weeks later during city review.
Give project leads and reviewers a shared view of findings so issues are addressed once, not passed around piecemeal.
BuildCompass flags uncertainty explicitly, helping teams focus on documentation gaps instead of assumptions.
Enter the review process knowing what's documented, what's missing, and what needs follow-up — before the city tells you.
BuildCompass doesn't replace professional judgment — it helps teams apply it earlier.